![]() |
||
|
|
||
|
Course Description Text About the class About Mr. Mac Course Outline Course Requirements Examinations Assignments Guest Speakers Hinduism Buddhism Judaism Christianity New Age Islam Class Activities Panel discussions Meditation Class Projects Current projects More Resources Contact Mr. Mac |
Journal Not required, but recommended (particularly for students who have
difficulty participating in discussions). This is an opportunity for the
students own personality and point of view to be expressed more
completely. Quality of expression, rather than quantity, is
always preferred. The journal could be organized into the following
sections: 1) Reflections/Philosophical Inquiry: Look back on class discussions. Bring your point of view to some of the ideas expressed. Consider what was not discussed (and perhaps should have been). Go beyond the immediate problems of people’s everyday religious experience. 2) Religion as Biography: Using the study guides
on various religious leaders, critique the role these individuals played
in the issues of their time and today.
Speculate as to how life today might have been different without
these people. 4) Editorials/Opposing
Viewpoints: This is
designed to see if the student can understand and argue both sides of an
issue, distinguish between traditional viewpoints within the
philosophical/religious context. Essentially, the opposing sides should
be presented and a position taken. 5) Arts/Social Commentary: This section deals with the changing mood and attitudes of society as expressed in its music, movies, plays, poetry, song lyrics, books, paintings, architecture, cartoons, etc. It is concerned with spiritual and social crises afflicting society such as racism, sexism, poverty, war, violence, crime, morality, environmental pollution, urban decay, alienation, loneliness, meaninglessness, power, powerlessness, and elitism. The critique should express the relationship of these attitudes to the contemporary religious belief systems. It should also evaluate the validity of the message the particular artist/writer was trying to communicate. Again, quality, not quantity. |
|
|
|